Obama’s NATO “Security transition” for Rapid State Terrorism -BY Dr. Abdul Ruff

Obama’s NATO “Security transition” for Rapid State Terrorism
-Terror NATO Axis Evils must Quit Afghanistan, Iraq! (Part-23)
BY Dr. Abdul Ruff

Responding to fake 9/11, America, after destroying Afghani resources and controlling the energy routes from Central Asia, also invaded Iraq, a country that had nothing to do with that catastrophe. Since the real reasons for our two current conflicts, access to oil and natural gas, defense of the petrodollar, war profiteering, are never admitted to, many Americans have concluded that we're simply waging war against Islam, which is, frankly, not that far off the mark considering unequivocal US terror support for fascist Israel whenever it attacks Gaza, Lebanon, Syria or any other Muslim population. The U.S. has also been killing Iraqi, Afghani and Pakistani civilians and threatening to invade energy rich Iran. Yet, it's a miracle many Arab Muslims don't want hate US-UK terror alliance and look forward to their “guidance” even during the Holy Ramadan month. Do the Arabs fond of Western liquor, etc?

NATO terror syndicate does not seem to end drinking Islamic blood in Afghanistan, even though over million defenseless Muslims have been slaughtered by the occupying western terrorists. David H. Petraeus, the top terror commander in Afghanistan, has just completed work on new guidelines for turning some security-terror duties over to Afghan forces in the months ahead, calling for American and allied troops to step back gradually from terrorized areas.

It is so dramatic that the Pentagon-CIA-FBI-Mossad combine still has not accepted responsibly for the Sept-11 and other follow-up terror operations around the world, although reports from various sources designate USA as the top most exporter of terrorism across the globe. Since the NATO syndicate terrorists are still occupying Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan, America still accuse Muslims of abetting Sept-11 - an action most possibly performed by the US-Israel-Russia-UK agents.

While other anti-Islamic partners support from “outside”, the USA and Russia, two of the veto powered notorious UNSC, are creating problems around the world and waging wars on alien lands. USA can bully only weak nations even if strong ones create problems for it, blocking its global advancements. America considers Russia as the top most rogue state on earth, but the USA, the remaining lone super power, cannot openly blame Russia mainly out of inherent fear complex. That Russia could have unleashed Sept-11 with assistance from a few American agents is never mentioned by the global media controlled by the US-UK other NATO terror syndicate nations.

It is an open secret in the West and Israel that IQ of Muslims are very low, if now almost zero. The non-Islamic western rogue states claim to the most intelligent and most brilliant people on earth who can do anything in the most foolproof fashion. Obviously, Muslims could not have “done” the Sept-11 so meticulously without leaving any trace of proof or evidence to track the culprits. The Muslims are trained only to perform the part of job assigned by non-Muslim intelligence and terrorists. Even then, there is no guarantee that they could not be caught because those who employ them have the proof with them to release whenever they feel OK. Sept-11 event, therefore, could not have been done so “finely” and escape the powerful US radars.

The 2001 Sept-11 action could have been undertaken and performed with sound proof only by those who nurture anti-Islamism; only by the Chrestians, and Jews. Russians, Britishers and their allies like American Jews who surround and control the White House, irrespective of who is the president there. Jews need not be imported from fascist Israel because Mossad has trained American Jews for decades now.

The new terror road map to long-term “security transition” does represent a substantial reorientation of how the president’s strategy of genocides or the “counterinsurgency” would be carried out, and is being viewed as the most significant effort by General Terrorist Petraeus to put his stamp on the mission since taking over last month. Other new areas of his emphasis have been rooting out corruption across the government and increasing security operations in additional areas of the country, including Kabul, the capital. The fear among supporters of the current strategy is that the priority in some NATO capitals — and among some in Washington — is getting out of an unpopular war, instead of committing to a patient, sustainable transition to Afghan government control.

In order to further their torturous terrorism, the NATO terrorist leaders claim entire Afghanistan is in the hands of Taliban. Why should then they stay on? Most of the current insurgent effort, this officer said, is focused in about one-third of Afghanistan, mostly in the south and east, although officials acknowledge that militants are showing their numbers in the north and west.

In asking the NATO terror forces to ignore the objections of the people to stop state terrorism in Afghanistan, Pentagon has no regard for the people who elect a regime and give a peace mission. With the broad guidelines complete, General Petraeus and his team now are turning to the task of writing specific projections for security transition by time and region in 2011. Those projections will be completed for a NATO meeting in Lisbon in November. In support of General Petraeus’s new guidelines, the White House, Pentagon and State Department leadership plan to continue lobbying NATO partners to take on more of the politically palatable training mission, even if they are pressured by their populations to end their combat role.

The guidelines envision that while some terror troops would leave the country when their current areas were secured, others could be reassigned new missions within Afghanistan, giving General Terror Petraeus flexibility in troop deployments as he confronts pressure from some allies and some Democrats in Washington to begin winding down the war in 2011. The emphasis in his plan would be on shifting troops to train Afghan security forces to accelerate the pace at which local police officers and soldiers could successfully take over, allowing even more of the alliance force to depart. But some remaining foreign troops could move into areas near their current operations where militants remain active. The security transition guidelines acknowledge that progress has been slow, and that Afghan forces are nowhere near ready to take over the mission across the country.

-----------
Dr. Abdul Ruff
Specialist on State Terrorism
Kabul/Afghanistan
02 September 2010

--
From Dr. Abdul Ruff Colachal: Specialist on State Terrorism; Chancellor-Founder of Centor for International Affairs(CIA) Chronicler of Freedom movements (Palestine, Kashmir, etc); Independent Columnist in International Affairs, Research Scholar (JNU) Terrorism is caused by anti-Islamic forces. Fake democracies like USA and India have zero tolerance to any criticism of their anti-Muslim and other aggressive practices. Anti-Muslimism and anti-Islamism are more dangerous than ”terrorism". Anti-Islamic forces & terrorists are using criminal elements for terrorizing the world and they are harming genuine interests of ordinary Muslims. We have many hypocrites among Muslims. Dr. Abdul Ruff (91-9961868309). abdulruff@gmail.com, abdulruff_jnu@yahoo.com)

Share this content with AddThis