Will there be light at the end of the tunnel in Afghanistan?
Terror NATO Axis Evils must Quit Afghanistan, Iraq! (Part-30)
BY Dr. Abdul Ruff

******

All American leaders and their militaries have pursued US imperialism quite religiously. Considering the NATO’s barbaric genocides in Afghanistan, Pakistan and Iraq during his tenure as US president, B. Obama is no worse than his predecessor Bush Jr in pursuing the US imperialist goals. And the roguish Pentagon, seeking to find more and more weapons clients, would not let Obama use his peaceful brain for the sake of world peace. Obama led NATO terrorists also have a passion for murders by drones in Pakistan and Afghanistan. At least 700 Pakistani civilians were killed in the CIA’s drone missile attacks during 2009 alone. Obama has not changed the Bush terrorism course to advance the US imperialist goals, but has dramatically intensified the CIA’s drone missile attacks against alleged insurgents inside areas of Pakistan bordering Afghanistan killing of civilians freely, covert war inside Yemen killing dozens of civilians, including the deputy governor of Marib Province, Jabir al Shabwani, in May. Obama has not only continued, he has expanded the murderous operations that were waged under the banner of the “war on terror” by the CIA and Pentagon during the Bushdom era.

A month from now and the NATO terror war in Afghanistan will enter its 10th year and over 2 million innocent Afghans have been massacred by the “democratic NATO terrorists. The terror war on Islam by the US led western NATO syndicate in Islamic world has dragged on for so long. War on Afghanistan and Iraq now is was a distraction from what they view as more pressing economic concerns. NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen wants to make the whole Afghan society inhospitable for patriots, or the so-called terrorists. Winning in Afghanistan isn't only about killing Muslims by calling them insurgents, Taliban and al Qaeda militants. NATO has deliberately created a weak, corrupt government and crippled economy in both Iraq and Afghanistan after looting their resources. The NATO boss was talking over breakfast three hours before his White House session could not explain why this war has dragged on for so long. Following their Oval Office meeting between Obama and NATO chief in Afghanistan, the White House issued a short statement noting that "the President thanked the Secretary General for the significant NATO commitment to promoting peace and stability around the world, particularly in Afghanistan where nearly 50,000 non-US terror troops, trainers, and Afghan civilian agents are serving alongside Americans with distinction."
The hard core terror strategists suggest the NATO terrorists to remain in Afghanistan, Pakistan as well as Iraq until America feels “energetically safe”. This is strange proposition even though Americans can never forget the disgrace it was bestowed upon in Vietnam in 1968 for similar misadventure on fictitious grounds only to showcase its globalized terror power. However, it is a positive trend in international terror politics that the Obama regime has finally decided to end terror operations at least in Iraq- leaving the genocides in Afghanistan and Af-Pak in tact and “we will complete a substantial drawdown of our troops. And, consistent with our agreement with the Iraqi government, all of our troops will be out of Iraq by the end of next year.” The ending of the US military intervention in Iraq does not necessarily herald a new peaceful era in Mideast, however. Chiefly because - the Pentagon has a deep-routed hidden plan for the energy rich region and Obama hasn’t begun any withdrawal from Afghanistan and Pakistan and his 50,000 terror troops are still left behind in Iraq to do the “needful”. Obama has snot yet spelt out how many more Muslims the NATO terrorists want to kill and eat!

NATO is the enemy of Pakistan, Afghanistan and Iraq. He spun the war as well as a non-native English speaker could spin it in English. The former Danish prime minister, who has been running the North Atlantic Treaty Organization since August 2009, said a timetable for progress in Afghanistan is in place at last. The effort, he said, is finally getting the resources it needs to beat back the “enemy”, and begin shifting control of the fight over to the Kabul government. Rasmussen envisions a "gradual transition" that will be "condition-based not calendar driven." If all goes according to plan, Afghanistan hopes to be able to handle its security challenges on its own by the end of 2014. "We will not leave until we have finished our job." He elaborated on how well things are going across much of Afghanistan. "In two-thirds of the country there is little fighting and quite a bit of development," he said. He admits: “our publics are impatient." Rasmussen is convinced the Afghan strategy is on the right track at last. "Progress would be to see physically lead responsibility handed over to the Afghans so that people can actually see the light at the end of the tunnel."
However, the NATO would not let any light appear anywhere in the tunnel, let alone at the end.
After nine years, the conflict has no end in sight. In every country that has deployed troops, there is rising popular opposition and calls for withdrawal. No-one in the White House, the Pentagon or NATO countries takes seriously Obama’s so-called July 2011 timetable to begin to draw down American troop numbers. Already the NATO leader has cited 2019 as the deadline year for complete withdrawal of paid state terrorists from Afghanistan. Petraeus’s request is a further reflection of the fact that the war has become a quagmire. The dispatch of even more troops, however, is the inevitable logic of the failing neo-colonial attempt to transform Afghanistan into a client state that the US can use as a base to dominate the resources of Central Asia, against key regional rivals such as China and Russia. Obama’s troop surge has not curbed Afghan resistance.

The blood thirsty Pentagon does not want to end the terror wars and it wants the withdrawal not to be benchmark-led. It should be based on the domestic political requirements in the US and on assessments that it can work. From the deserts of North Africa, to the mountains of Pakistan, to former Soviet republics in Central Asia crippled by ethnic and religious strife—the USA has significantly increased military and intelligence operations, pursuing the enemy using robotic drones and commando teams, paying contractors to spy and training local operatives to destabilize Islamic world in the name of bogus chase of “militants”.

The state terror experts offer explanations for what the US made so-called Al-Qaeda and Talban do and don’t. What is amazing is the crude fact that their imaginative understating becomes the fact of matter; and these agencies are placed only in their understanding of them – no other format even if the truth is to the contrary. They view their total theocratic focus as the best view of Al-Qaeda, their future, and their motivations. They conclude that these have no plans for governing, there is a frighteningly lack of political goals and they want to annihilate the west and expand the Caliphate. That is not only unfair but also deliberate misleading to the public. All that the fighters for sovereignty from the occupying NATO terrorists is to get rid of the foreign terrorists and establish Islamic societies to live according to the Shariiah proving all opportunities for equality and prosperity. They will be guided in that by the facts of life of Prophet SAS and Holy Quran. Obviously, the present generation of Muslims are not fit for that they are corrupt, criminal minded and mostly hypocrites. The Muslim rulers care only about their private (mostly grabbed from the national wealth and from the people) wealth in their own countries and abroad. They support the notorious West only for the sake of safeguarding their wealth.

(More to follow…>)

Dr. Abdul Ruff Colachal
Specialist on State Terrorism
Kabul/Afghanistan
08 September 2010

--
From Dr. Abdul Ruff Colachal: Specialist on State Terrorism; Chancellor-Founder of Centor for International Affairs(CIA) Chronicler of Freedom movements (Palestine, Kashmir, etc); Independent Columnist in International Affairs, Research Scholar (JNU) Terrorism is caused by anti-Islamic forces. Fake democracies like USA and India have zero tolerance to any criticism of their anti-Muslim and other aggressive practices. Anti-Muslimism and anti-Islamism are more dangerous than "terrorism". Anti-Islamic forces & terrorists are using criminal elements for terrorizing the world and they are harming genuine interests of ordinary Muslims. We have many hypocrites among Muslims. For individual copy of my articles for publication, pl write to me. (abdulruff_jnu@yahoo.com) Dr. Abdul Ruff (91-9961868309).