2011-05-09 18:21
KUALA LUMPUR, Malaysia, May 9, 2011 /PRNewswire-Asia/ --
http://www.rspo.org/media/index.php
The Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO) today released a statement of their positioning on the Truth in Labeling - Palm Oil Bill 2010 in Australia, whereby mandatory labeling of products containing palm oil has been proposed.
The purpose of the Act is to ensure that consumers have clear, accurate information about the inclusion of palm oil in foods; and to encourage the use of certified sustainable palm oil in order to promote the protection of wildlife habitats. RSPO supports the latter objective.
Darrel Webber, Secretary General of the RSPO, commented that: "However, distinguishing palm oil as the only edible oil that requires labeling implies that other edible oils do not face similar challenges. RSPO takes a strong view against this supposition as issues surrounding environmental destruction. Social concerns and wildlife conservation are prevalent across the board with cultivation of any type of monoculture crops.
"Further to this, such a labeling exercise that singles out palm oil may only serve to ostracize agricultural farmers in developing markets such as Indonesia, Malaysia, Papua New Guinea, South America, West Africa, etc. whose key source of income comes from palm oil. These smallholders need to be educated, guided, encouraged and inspired to adopt sustainable standards and solutions, rather than have their livelihoods affected. RSPO certification program aims to support smallholders in this light," Webber reiterated.
He went on to say that: "The long term repercussion of this proposed Bill may decrease the demand for palm oil but will not eliminate the key reasons this proposal is aimed at addressing in the first place. This is because edible oil is a key ingredient in most consumer products. Demand would merely shift to other vegetable oils, increasing the sustainability problems connected to these other particular crops."
An imminent development which the RSPO hopes will address some of the strategic thinking and considerations behind this proposed Bill will be the launch of the RSPO trademark, which will be stamped on product packaging and labels which contain RSPO Certified Sustainable Palm Oil (CSPO) in their raw material or feedstock, targeted for launch by mid 2011 this year.
The trademark will enable consumers to confirm very quickly that the products they buy contribute to sustainable production of palm oil. The trademark logo could end up on the packaging of thousands of consumer products worldwide.
"RSPO certification at the plantation level and the trademark on the end product completes the loop from upstream to downstream within the supply chain and will reflect that sustainable oil palm cultivation does not contribute to the sustained destruction of valuable tropical forests or damage the interests of people in the regions where the palms are grown," Webber concluded.
SOURCE Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil
3 Comments
Australian Palm Oil Labeling Bill
Submitted by Palmhugger (not verified) on
Great post! In our view, the RSPO's position on this bill is rational, sensible and practical. Despite the bill being passed in the Australian Senate, any final decision on this bill being promulgated into law by the House must take into consideration the long term effects of the bill on the livelihood of oil palm smallholders, who contrary to popular opinion, contribute more than 40% of total global palm oil production.
Given palm oil's hyper productivity of close to ten times that of competing oils, a switch to other edible oil crop cultivation will only exacerbate sustainability problems as ten times more rainforests will have to be cleared just to maintain current supply levels!
Good Commodity
Submitted by Mainan (not verified) on
Palm oil is a good commodity now. The price always growing up.
What if palm oil production stops?
Submitted by Palmhugger (not verified) on
If Malaysian and Indonesian plantations were to stop palm oil production for a year, it would be interesting to see the panic as over 52% of the total world oils and fats exports will disappear (2006 figures and probably higher% now).
The average palm oil yield per year is nearly 6 times that of its nearest competitor, rape seed which is Australia's third most important crop, 8 times that of sunflower and 10 times that of soyabean. Imagine the deforestation and devastation in the 'developed' countries and tropical forests if oil palm is prevented from production and expansion to meet the world's demand for oils and fats. The oil palm is a perennial tree crop and in no way, can the other competing annual crops be more 'green'.
The orang utan and other endangered animals are now well protected. The industry is pandering to the greenies with the RSPO scheme and yet, it is still being attacked, even by the WWF, its RSPO partner. Is it so difficult to ponder on the real motives of the Australian Palm Oil Labeling Bill?